About Us
Imagen destacada
  • Politics
By 4ever.news
1 days ago
DOJ Gives California 48 Hours to Verify Suspected Noncitizen Voters Before Counting Their Ballots

The Trump administration is demanding answers from California election officials before November’s midterms, warning that suspected noncitizens may have been sent mail-in ballots and insisting that their eligibility be verified before those ballots are counted.

The Justice Department has given California Secretary of State Shirley Weber and Los Angeles County election chief Dean Logan 48 hours to implement a verification process. The demand puts a critical election-integrity question squarely before Democratic officials in one of the nation’s largest and most politically influential states: Why wait until after a potentially unlawful vote has been counted to determine whether the person who cast it was eligible to vote?

Acting Deputy Attorney General Trent McCotter sent letters to Weber and Logan on Tuesday, accompanied by a password-protected thumb drive identifying individuals whom the department believes are likely noncitizens who were sent vote-by-mail ballots for the November 2026 federal election.

The distinction is important. The individuals identified by federal authorities have not, simply by appearing on the list, been proven to be noncitizens or to have voted illegally. The immediate issue is whether election officials can verify their eligibility before counting any ballots associated with them.

That is precisely why the administration is pressing for action now rather than waiting for investigators to pursue possible violations after Election Day.

The principle should not be controversial: eligible citizens have the right to vote, and election officials have a responsibility to ensure that ballots counted in federal elections comply with the law.

California has had months to address the federal government's questions. On July 16, Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin first contacted Weber about suspected noncitizens appearing on the state's voter rolls.

In her July 23 response, Weber questioned the reliability of the federal information and requested details about its methodology, data sources, and how the government had obtained California's voter registration list.

Those are legitimate questions to examine when assessing the accuracy of voter records. But they do not, by themselves, establish that the individuals identified by federal authorities are eligible voters. Nor does the absence of a public finding prove that any particular person is ineligible.

The dispute now centers on whether state and county officials will establish a process to resolve those questions before the midterms.

California's voter registration records are not entirely inaccessible to outside organizations. Certain information is available to qualified political parties, campaigns, researchers, and others under state rules, while sensitive information is restricted. Federal officials may use lawfully obtained records to compare registration information against other government data, although the precise methodology used in this case has not been established in the information provided.

That comparison matters because voter registration systems must be accurate, particularly when ballots are distributed by mail. A potential mismatch should trigger appropriate verification, not an automatic determination of guilt or eligibility.

California's record also includes a documented election-fraud case that demonstrates why the integrity of registration procedures deserves serious attention.

Former Lodi City Councilman Shakir Khan pleaded no contest to 14 election-fraud felonies related to the 2020 general election, according to the source report. Investigators found that he had registered noncitizens living overseas, including his brother in Pakistan. The San Joaquin County sheriff also confirmed that a Pakistani citizen living in Pakistan voted in California's 2020 election.

That case does not establish that the people identified in the DOJ's current review committed similar offenses. It does, however, illustrate why authorities cannot simply assume that every registration record is accurate or that every potential violation will be caught before a ballot is cast.