WASHINGTON, D.C. – Senator Ron Johnson (R-WI) has issued a stark warning, revealing his belief that communist China is actively funding opposition to critical artificial intelligence data centers in the United States. Speaking during a Breitbart News Fight Club Roundtable, the Wisconsin conservative laid bare what he sees as a deliberate foreign effort to undermine America's technological edge.
The discussion, hosted by Breitbart News Editor-in-Chief Alex Marlow and Washington Bureau Chief Matthew Boyle, delved into the profound stakes of AI development. Johnson didn't mince words about the geopolitical chess match at play.
"I would hate to see China win the war on AI. Again, I don't have the specifics on this. I have a sense that China is funding the opposition to AI centers," Johnson stated, connecting domestic pushback directly to Beijing's strategic ambitions.
While acknowledging legitimate questions about infrastructure, Johnson argued that some concerns are being amplified by external forces. "Now, at the same time, I think we need to be responsible. We need to look at the demands on the electrical grid. I think demands on water resources are way overstated, but overstated because China is funding the propaganda against these things," he elaborated, calling for Americans to recognize the adversary's hand in public discourse.
The senator emphasized the imperative to counter this insidious influence, urging clarity and resolve. "We need to expose that fact, and then we need the American public to open up their eyes and go, okay, do we really want to handicap ourselves? Do we really want to lose the race to AI again, and this is with all the trepidation of what is AI going to create?"
Johnson also offered a common-sense perspective on AI's impact on the American workforce, pushing back against alarmist narratives. "I'm far less concerned about AI replacing jobs. Take a look at America 100 years ago, and we're an agricultural economy, and you had way more than 50 percent of the American population or working Americans providing food. Now it is single digits. That's a good thing. I mean, all those farmers lost jobs, but they're doing other things," he explained, drawing a parallel to historical economic shifts.
He continued, highlighting current realities: "Right now, we don't have enough workers. Our biggest problem isn't trade or trade deficits. We don't have workers, so, you know, AI will free up and will have more workers producing things." This perspective aligns with an America First economic strategy focused on productivity and innovation.
WATCH — Exclusive — Ron Johnson on Fighting the Left & Deep State: "The Only Weapon We Have Is Truth":
However, Johnson articulated a deeper, more profound concern regarding the future of AI itself: the potential for "out-of-control AI." Drawing from his science fiction literacy, he evoked the need for ethical guardrails akin to Isaac Asimov's Three Laws of Robotics. "Who is going to provide general intelligence the rules, so they don't destroy the human race?" he asked, emphasizing a critical leadership vacuum.
The senator expressed palpable skepticism about entrusting the fundamental safeguards of advanced AI solely to Silicon Valley's tech moguls. "Now, I don't have faith in these kids who are running these AI companies — they're the same ones that unleash social media on us, to many benefits, to great benefits, but also a great deal of harm to people as well," Johnson asserted, laying bare the potential for unchecked ambition to repeat past mistakes. "Because, again, they want to make a buck. Nothing wrong with that, but this is where I actually do need government."
Johnson concluded by reinforcing the true priority: "You need responsible people making sure that we have basic laws so that generalized intelligence doesn't destroy the human race. That's what worries me. Not AI centers, not data centers." He reiterated the necessity of being mindful of infrastructure impacts, like the electrical grid and water, but maintained that the greater threat lies in ceding the AI race to adversaries and failing to rein in its most dangerous potentials. America's future, he suggests, depends on both technological leadership and moral fortitude, free from foreign interference and guided by common-sense principles.
