Actor Mark Ruffalo has officially endorsed billionaire Tom Steyer in California’s race for governor, a move that is drawing attention due to Ruffalo’s frequent criticism of billionaires and concentrated wealth.

Ruffalo, known for his political activism in addition to his Hollywood career, has often spoken out against the influence of wealthy elites and has regularly advocated for policies aimed at addressing economic inequality. That history has led some observers to question the consistency of his latest endorsement.

Steyer, a billionaire businessman and political figure, is seeking the governor’s office in California and has received support from a number of prominent figures as the campaign continues to take shape.

The endorsement has sparked discussion among political commentators and voters who note the apparent contrast between Ruffalo’s past rhetoric and his support for a candidate whose financial status places him among the very group he has frequently criticized.

Critics argue that the situation reflects a common pattern in modern politics, where opposition to wealth often seems to depend less on the amount of money involved and more on who happens to possess it. Apparently, not all billionaires are created equal—at least when they support the “right” political causes.

Supporters of Steyer, meanwhile, point to his political involvement and policy positions as reasons for backing his candidacy, regardless of his personal wealth.

As California’s gubernatorial race continues to develop, endorsements from high-profile celebrities are likely to remain part of the conversation. Ultimately, however, it will be voters—not Hollywood stars—who decide who occupies the governor’s office.

The debate serves as another reminder that Americans continue to pay close attention to whether public figures practice the same principles they advocate, an expectation that remains a cornerstone of political accountability.