Former President Bill Clinton is suddenly very vocal about Jeffrey Epstein, taking to X to complain that Republicans on the House Oversight Committee are “playing games” after rejecting what he claims is full cooperation. According to Clinton, he already provided a sworn statement about what he knows regarding Epstein’s crimes and has even agreed to testify in person before Congress. Yet, in his words, that is “still not enough for Republicans.” Funny how accountability always feels like persecution when it finally shows up at your door.
Both Bill and Hillary Clinton have agreed to testify after House Republicans issued subpoenas and raised the possibility of contempt proceedings. Naturally, Republicans weren’t impressed. They accused the Clintons of trying to dodge contempt by asking for special treatment. Their attorneys sent a letter saying they would comply, but only under certain conditions, including that their testimony be open, filmed, and transcribed. In other words, “we’ll show up… but on our terms.” A classic move when pressure starts to feel real.

Democrat ranking member Robert Garcia quickly claimed this amounted to full compliance, but Chairman James Comer wasn’t buying it. Comer said the agreement lacked clear details and, conveniently, did not include any dates for depositions. According to Comer, the only reason the Clintons suddenly agreed to terms is because the House moved forward with contempt. Amazing how cooperation appears once consequences enter the room.
Comer made clear he plans to clarify the terms and then decide the next steps with committee members. The House even temporarily paused contempt proceedings after the Clintons’ sudden change of heart, proving Republicans are willing to be fair—just not naïve.

Democrats complained that Comer has not gone after others or the Department of Justice for failing to produce all Epstein-related documents by the deadline set by Congress last year. Clinton seized on that point, accusing Republicans of wanting cameras “but only behind closed doors” and claiming this arrangement does not help Epstein’s victims or the public. He went further, calling the process “pure politics” and refusing to be used in what he labeled a “closed-door kangaroo court.”
Clinton insisted that if Republicans want answers, they should hold a public hearing so Americans can see what this is really about. That is a bold statement from someone who seems very interested in controlling the conditions of his own testimony. But the reality is simple: Republicans are doing exactly what they promised—seeking the truth, even when it makes powerful people uncomfortable.
And in a country that still believes no one is above the law, that’s not “playing games.” That’s accountability—and thanks to Republican leadership, the pursuit of the truth is still moving forward.